UMFO - Sport-Tek Men's Endeavor Polo Size:S 57/43 cotton/poly pique Moisture-wicking Self-fabric MLP_1913756_1029377

Name: UMFO - Sport-Tek Men's Endeavor Polo Size:S 57/43 cotton/poly pique Moisture-wicking Self-fabric MLP_1913756_1029377
Brand: www.pmscs.com
SKU: 40299032904
Price: 29.99 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.36 (16 reviews)

SKU 40299032904 · ★ 4.4

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $7.50 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 23 - Oct 28

Yarn notes

Description

UMFO Sport Tek Men's Endeavor Polo Size:S 57 43 cotton poly pique Moisture wicking Self fabric MLP_1913756_1029377 57 43 cotton poly pique Moisture wicking Self fabric collar with collar stand Slight forward shoulder 5 button placket Dyed to match buttons (Dark Smoke buttons on Charcoal Heather and Black Heather) Notched sleeve cuffs Rounded drop tail hem Tag free label ** This fabric is designed to wick sweat away from the body to the surface of the garment With a subtle heather texture and moisture wicking technology Note*: W (Width)

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for UMFO - Sport-Tek Men's Endeavor Polo Size:S 57/43 cotton/poly pique Moisture-wicking Self-fabric MLP_1913756_1029377

What should I check before agreeing to a seller's proposed resolution?

Do not carry out an unverified instruction that conflicts with the documented product requirements. Keep any unresolved question explicit rather than assuming it was included automatically.

What should I check before ordering a product again?

A familiar product name does not guarantee an unchanged version. Use your earlier order reference to ask the seller a precise comparison question.

How can I describe a product problem without guessing its cause?

Start with what you directly observed about the issue. Separate observable facts from your interpretation of those facts.