Dan Quisenberry Autographed 1980 Topps Rookie Card #667 Kansas City Royals PSA/DNA #44196957 baseball This is a 3x5 Index

Name: Dan Quisenberry Autographed 1980 Topps Rookie Card #667 Kansas City Royals PSA/DNA #44196957 baseball This is a 3x5 Index
Brand: www.pmscs.com
SKU: 44099225942
Price: 89.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0072 (28 reviews)

SKU 44099225942 · ★ 4.0

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $22.25 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 27 - Nov 1

Yarn notes

Description

Dan Quisenberry Autographed 1980 Topps Rookie Card #667 Kansas City Royals PSA DNA #44196957 baseball This is a 3x5 Index This is a 3x5 Index Card that has been hand signed by A This autographed piece of memorabilia comes with an official Certificate of Authenticity from James Spence Authentication LLC that guarantees the authenticity of the autograph This is a 1980 Topps Rookie Card #667 that has been hand signed by Dan Quisenberry It has been authenticated by PSA DNA and comes encapsulated in their tamper proof holder

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Dan Quisenberry Autographed 1980 Topps Rookie Card #667 Kansas City Royals PSA/DNA #44196957 baseball This is a 3x5 Index

What should I check before agreeing to a seller's proposed resolution?

Do not carry out an unverified instruction that conflicts with the documented product requirements. Keep any unresolved question explicit rather than assuming it was included automatically.

What should I check before ordering a product again?

A familiar product name does not guarantee an unchanged version. Use your earlier order reference to ask the seller a precise comparison question.

How can I describe a product problem without guessing its cause?

Start with what you directly observed about the issue. Separate observable facts from your interpretation of those facts.